From 0980780f6b7d89843b7cd81370afb65530726925 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: kaotisk Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2024 20:28:22 +0300 Subject: Fixed title/filename --- news/1726334198-knowing_a_person_online | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++ ...ars,_getting_vibes_of_honesty,_participating_in | 61 ---------------------- 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) create mode 100644 news/1726334198-knowing_a_person_online delete mode 100644 news/1726334198-knowing_a_person_online_for_years,_getting_vibes_of_honesty,_participating_in diff --git a/news/1726334198-knowing_a_person_online b/news/1726334198-knowing_a_person_online new file mode 100644 index 0000000..aee2cd4 --- /dev/null +++ b/news/1726334198-knowing_a_person_online @@ -0,0 +1,61 @@ +Knowing a person online for years, getting vibes of honesty, participating in +interesting projects, gets involved with blockchain development, starts their +own blockchain, but maintains a mindset of ownership. + +Furthermore, colors of authoritarian noise came along the way as well, slowly +evolving from a "I know better" perspective, not giving a dime about others' +feelings. + +This seems to be understood as determination by that person. So it went on for +years, hidden behind the facade of a good/noble person. + +The outcomes of looking at their work though, are not hidden that much. The said +determination made the first peer to peer network to be tainted by such mindset +that the architecture of it is, since 2018, an inequality network. To add more +in that, the work was never audited as it should. Cryptographic algorithms +accompanying the software were written from scratch, breaching in silence the +trust of the user-base. + +But for all the above, even if anyone spoke up about those misconceptions and +detouring from the original idea, they did not reach my ears or eyes. +During the past month, the said person stroke once more, this time, even more +methodically and aware of what he was about to do. Taking back previous claims +about the direction of the project which in his words, was community driven. + +A famous quote applies here for the fellow person: "Dictators free their selves, +but they enslave the people". In such situation though, with humanity working +collectively towards freedom and equality, the communities' backlash was and +still is tremendous. A thing that in no way was expected by the actor. + +As every dictator, he opposed his own people, trying to silence them and forced +them to exile. Before getting in my hands proofs on chain and commit histories, +trying to convince he is most likely on the wrong, I met up a new character, a +relentless one that also moved quickly to oppose me as well. Even in such +position that I was quickly put in exile as well. I did my best to remind the +person about values and such, but apparently, when liquidity becomes the new +belief system, nothing really matters. + +This whole situation left me angered. Not anger towards the person but towards +me, getting uncomfortable with my own decisions to trust not the person, but +their code. A code that the person sees as his legacy, a classic dictator's +mindset, but even with my little experience I can understand that it is +effectively dangerous to run. A code base that for more than 10 years is +depending on an unstable release of a library which was receiving updates +tactically and had many stable releases since then. + +That would be a more honest take on his partners presentation, particularly on +the session "Meet CJD". The ID of this post will be included as a reference, as +well with a date of posting, in my personal not decentralized blog feed that you +can find at https://git.kaotisk-hund.com/01-NEWS/.git/tree/news shortly after +this is posted here, in pkteerium.xyz, operated by the said person. + +Thanks for reading and be always alarmed, +Kaotisk Hund + + +PS: I should clarify that when referring to "CJD", I mean "Cartman James +DeLisle". Any similarities with real people is unintentional and the whole post +is a work of fiction dealing with philosophical questions and values. + +The above could be found at (unless I got banned from the site): +- https://pkteerium.xyz/@kaotisk/posts/Am07AS7WJjQ15X7L0q diff --git a/news/1726334198-knowing_a_person_online_for_years,_getting_vibes_of_honesty,_participating_in b/news/1726334198-knowing_a_person_online_for_years,_getting_vibes_of_honesty,_participating_in deleted file mode 100644 index aee2cd4..0000000 --- a/news/1726334198-knowing_a_person_online_for_years,_getting_vibes_of_honesty,_participating_in +++ /dev/null @@ -1,61 +0,0 @@ -Knowing a person online for years, getting vibes of honesty, participating in -interesting projects, gets involved with blockchain development, starts their -own blockchain, but maintains a mindset of ownership. - -Furthermore, colors of authoritarian noise came along the way as well, slowly -evolving from a "I know better" perspective, not giving a dime about others' -feelings. - -This seems to be understood as determination by that person. So it went on for -years, hidden behind the facade of a good/noble person. - -The outcomes of looking at their work though, are not hidden that much. The said -determination made the first peer to peer network to be tainted by such mindset -that the architecture of it is, since 2018, an inequality network. To add more -in that, the work was never audited as it should. Cryptographic algorithms -accompanying the software were written from scratch, breaching in silence the -trust of the user-base. - -But for all the above, even if anyone spoke up about those misconceptions and -detouring from the original idea, they did not reach my ears or eyes. -During the past month, the said person stroke once more, this time, even more -methodically and aware of what he was about to do. Taking back previous claims -about the direction of the project which in his words, was community driven. - -A famous quote applies here for the fellow person: "Dictators free their selves, -but they enslave the people". In such situation though, with humanity working -collectively towards freedom and equality, the communities' backlash was and -still is tremendous. A thing that in no way was expected by the actor. - -As every dictator, he opposed his own people, trying to silence them and forced -them to exile. Before getting in my hands proofs on chain and commit histories, -trying to convince he is most likely on the wrong, I met up a new character, a -relentless one that also moved quickly to oppose me as well. Even in such -position that I was quickly put in exile as well. I did my best to remind the -person about values and such, but apparently, when liquidity becomes the new -belief system, nothing really matters. - -This whole situation left me angered. Not anger towards the person but towards -me, getting uncomfortable with my own decisions to trust not the person, but -their code. A code that the person sees as his legacy, a classic dictator's -mindset, but even with my little experience I can understand that it is -effectively dangerous to run. A code base that for more than 10 years is -depending on an unstable release of a library which was receiving updates -tactically and had many stable releases since then. - -That would be a more honest take on his partners presentation, particularly on -the session "Meet CJD". The ID of this post will be included as a reference, as -well with a date of posting, in my personal not decentralized blog feed that you -can find at https://git.kaotisk-hund.com/01-NEWS/.git/tree/news shortly after -this is posted here, in pkteerium.xyz, operated by the said person. - -Thanks for reading and be always alarmed, -Kaotisk Hund - - -PS: I should clarify that when referring to "CJD", I mean "Cartman James -DeLisle". Any similarities with real people is unintentional and the whole post -is a work of fiction dealing with philosophical questions and values. - -The above could be found at (unless I got banned from the site): -- https://pkteerium.xyz/@kaotisk/posts/Am07AS7WJjQ15X7L0q -- cgit v1.2.3